My Photo

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Blog powered by TypePad

« How writing creates value | Main | How I got into YC as a non-technical single founder »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bde769e2014e87e1dde9970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Get Fast Fast: A Project Management Approach To Lightweight Rowing:

Comments

Thanks for this guide. Do you have any advice as to drag factors for the various erg pieces?

"Do you have any advice as to drag factors for the various erg pieces?"

Drag factor should be around 100 for the 90 minute pieces, maybe a little more for the sprint stuff.

Alex - this is a great record of your achievements. Some questions:
1 - which year did you do this?
2 - what is your current personal best 2k?
3 - are you still rowing?
4 - have you ever tried using Rowperfect or Dynamic Concept 2 instead?

I work for www.rowperfect.co.uk and we publish e-books about rowing and training. Would you be interested in having us offer your work on the site?

Rebecca Caroe

Rebecca,

This was done in summer and fall 2006. I don't have a current best 2k, as I'm not currently rowing for the reasons explained in this thread: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2120613

I actually haven't ever tried either the Rowperfect of Dynamic Concept 2. I probably would if I ever wanted to do this again. I'm generally sold on the idea, but all my university had available at the time was the Concept 2 Model 2. (With optional sliders, which I used for some of the sprint pieces during team practices, but which I found to be too much of a pain to use for the 90 minute pieces.)

If a heavyweight wanted to adapt this programme what would you change? Would the workouts stay the same and the targets change? If so what sort of targets would someone aiming for a 6:10 be looking at.. Thanks!

How tall should one be to expect reasonable success from this program, and what was your starting weight at the beginning of your training?

@D

5'9 - 6'2 is best. I was around 172 when I started the program, and ultimately weighed in at 155.

Have you done any workouts such as 4x1k 12 minute intervals, 4x2k 7min rest or 8x500m with 2:30 rest? What's your 1k PR?

I have been training for the past two years harder than ever and havent made much improvement. My personal best is a 6:49.

Some of splits ares 8x500 1:38.5
4x1k 1:41.5
4x2k 146.8

1k PR 139.3 still with all of this im never prepared for a 2k on test day and always do awful.

@J

"Would the workouts stay the same and the targets change? If so what sort of targets would someone aiming for a 6:10 be looking at.. Thanks!"

The workouts would stay the same, but the targets would change. However, I don't know exactly what the targets would be offhand. You would have to talk to a bunch of people who pull sub 6:10 and then get their benchmarks on each of these metrics.

My wild-ass guess would be:

steady stating at sub 1:50 for 90 minutes at a 155 heart rate
385 lbs for squats
32 pullups

But again these are really just guesses. It also depends somewhat on each individual person depending on their physiology. That's why recording your workouts is so important, because it lets you not only change the workouts as necessary, but also refine your targets as necessary.

@Chris

"Have you done any workouts such as 4x1k 12 minute intervals, 4x2k 7min rest or 8x500m with 2:30 rest? What's your 1k PR?"

I haven't done any of these workouts to the best of my knowledge. The sprint work I chose to include is somewhat arbitrary. What's important is that you're doing roughly the volume I recommend, and that when you do it you're pulling your flat-out hardest. So you could substitute my recommendations for your workouts if you like. (Unlike the 90 minute cardio sessions and the weights where I would recommend doing them as is, at least until you have enough data to make intelligent data-driven decisions for yourself.)

For what it's worth, there is some additional discussion of this post here:

http://usrowers.com/talkrowing/lofiversion/index.php?t11942.html

When working your way to being able to do the steady state would you suggest doing steady state at a 155 heart rate and just work on getting the split down at that heart rate or should I start out at a 1:55 split time and just keep doing it because as I get used to it my heartrate will go down.

@Doug

You need to erg at 75% of your max hr, which is usually around 150 - 155 for most people. It's fine even if you have to keep it at 2:30 (or even worse) for the first couple weeks, you'll quickly improve. However, if you just row at 1:55 regardless of your HR then you won't actually improve because your body won't be using the right sources of energy. (You need to train your aerobic system, which doesn't happen if your HR is too high.) The concept 2 training guide I link to explains the actual physiology, as I think does the Lactate Threshold Training book or probably most other books on the science of endurance training.

I really like what you are doing here, and I think I am going to try to jump on this program. One question, what is the reason for keeping the drag factor at 100? I would have assumed to keep it around a 130ish?

@Brett,

Great! Good luck with the program.

As for the drag factor, I usually just set the damper halfway between 3 and 4, which is around 100 on my home erg and around 113 on the one I use at the gym. I think the biggest argument for keeping it a little bit lower is that erging puts some stress on your lower back at the catch, especially when going at a slow stroke rate where the flywheel has time to slow down significantly between each stroke.

The benefit of the lower stroke rate though is that I think it's a little easier on other parts of your body, in terms of avoiding things like carpal tunnel and other overuse type injuries. So that's why I advocate the low stroke rate, but with also a fairly low drag factor.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment